P. Delmas et A. Gimona, OSTEOPOROSIS PREVENTION CLINICAL-STUDY PROGRAM, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 64, 1996, pp. 39-45
Objectives: Oestrogens are widely believed to be effective against pos
tmenopausal osteoporosis. However there are some outstanding questions
which still need an answer. For example, the minimal effective dose r
egimen of oestradiol needs to be established and the relationship betw
een oestradiol levels and efficacy on bone turnover and bone mass need
s to be further clarified. Methods: Menorest(R) is being tested in the
prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. A phase II/III clinical progr
am, that includes two double blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled,
parallel group, 2-year studies, has started in 58 centers in Europe an
d South Africa. Four-hundred eighty women will be enrolled in the two
studies (201 and 305). The objective of the studies is to evaluate the
efficacy of Menorest(R) at different doses and regimens, in the preve
ntion of bone loss in early postmenopausal women. In study 201, the tr
eatment regimen is 'cyclic sequential' (24 days of transdermal oestrad
iol during a 28-day cycle with progestin taken during the last 14 days
of oestrogen administration). In study 305 the treatment regimen is '
continuous sequential' (28 days of transdermal oestradiol during, a 28
-day cycle with progestin taken during the last 14 days of oestrogen a
dministration). The doses studied are 50, 75, 100 mu g/day in study 20
1, and 25, 50, 75 mu g/day in study 305, (the two studies are otherwis
e identical). All 'active-dose' treated groups receive dydrogesterone
20 mg/day during the last 14 days of Menorest(R) administration and pl
acebo tablets are given to the placebo patch group. The main entry cri
teria are natural or surgical menopause, (with hormonal confirmation)
from 1 to 6 years, with no contra-indication to HRT and with a bone mi
neral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine with a T-score between 0 and -
3. Women with severe vasomotor symptoms are excluded from the studies.
The primary efficacy variable is the mean change from baseline, measu
red with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 2 years, in the lum
bar spine BMD (L1-L4). Whole body and hip BMD are also evaluated. Mark
ers of bone turnover (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin
and CrossLaps) are monitored throughout the study. Blood samples are d
rawn on the third day of patch application at certain visits in order
to monitor oestradiol levels and establish any potential correlation w
ith activity on bone (BMD, bone markers). Besides routine safety analy
sis, lipid profile and coagulation factors are also monitored. Special
attention is drawn to endometrial safety with endometrial aspiration
or trans vaginal sonography (TVS) performed before study start, after
1 year and at 2 years of treatment. Results: Data presented here refer
to 146 patients for whom demographics and clinical data are already a
vailable, and to 370 patients for whom baseline DXA data have already
been validated. The mean (+/- S.D.) age of the women included in the t
wo studies is 53.4 (+/- 3.2) with a menopausal age of 38.3 (+/- 19.6)
months. None of the women who entered the study had severe postmenopau
sal symptoms as shown by a mean number of hot flushes of 2.2 (+/- 2.6)
per day, during the last 14 days before inclusion. The mean (+/- S.D.
) lumbar spine (L1-LA) BMD is 0.914 (+/- 0.122) g/cm(2) which correspo
nds to a Z-score of -0.26 and a T-score of -1.17. Femoral neck, trocha
nter and Wards triangle have a BMD which is below the mean of age-matc
hed controls but still within the normal range (Z-scores between 0 and
-1). Only the whole body BMD is over the mean of age-matched controls
, with a Z-score of 0.32. The in-vivo precision mean (+/- S.D.), was c
alculated and showed a value of 0.868 (+/- 0.872), which can be consid
ered a good performance. Conclusions: In summary, the use of one of th
e most recent techniques to assess the bone mineral content/density to
gether with an accurate quality control program on all the densitomete
rs used in the studies will help to improve the in-vivo BMD precision
and therefore make it possible to answer the above mentioned questions
.