DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF PHOTOSYSTEM-II TO LIGHT STRESS IN LIGHT-ACCLIMATED PEA LEAVES DEPENDS ON THE CAPACITY FOR PHOTOCHEMICAL AND NONRADIATIVE DISSIPATION OF LIGHT
Yi. Park et al., DIFFERENTIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF PHOTOSYSTEM-II TO LIGHT STRESS IN LIGHT-ACCLIMATED PEA LEAVES DEPENDS ON THE CAPACITY FOR PHOTOCHEMICAL AND NONRADIATIVE DISSIPATION OF LIGHT, PLANT SCI, 115(2), 1996, pp. 137-149
The importance of photoprotective strategies for Photosystem (PS) II f
unction under all light regimes was determined from the content of fun
ctional PS II, measured by repetitive flash yield of oxygen evolution,
in leaves of pea (Pisum sativum L.) grown under 50 (low light), 250 (
medium light), and 650 (high light) mu mol photons m(-2) s(-1). The mo
dulation of PS II functionality in vivo was induced in 1.1% CO2 after
infiltration of leaves with water (control), nigericin (a lipophilic u
ncoupler) or dithiothreitol (DTT, inhibitor of violaxanthin to zeaxant
hin conversion) through the cut petioles of leaves of 22-24 day-old pl
ants. In all nigericin-treated pea leaves, photoinactivation of PS II
was greatly increased with increasing photon exposure (mel photons m(-
2)). This nigericin-induced increase of photoinactivation of PS II was
greater than that induced by DTT in medium- and high-light pea leaves
, but comparable in low-light peas. In low-light peas during steady-st
ate photosynthesis, the development of non-photochemical quenching of
chlorophyll fluorescence (NPQ, measured as F-m/F'(m)-1) was lowest, ac
companying the highest reduction state of PS II (measured by photochem
ical quenching, qp) Further, the susceptibility of PS II to light stre
ss, estimated as (1-qp)/NPQ [Park et al., Plant Cell Physiol., 36 (199
5) 1163-1167], was highest in low-light peas. The decline of chlorophy
ll fluorescence from maximum (F-m) to steady-state level during induct
ion phase of chlorophyll fluorescence was retarded by nigericin treatm
ent, with a greater inhibitory effect in high- and medium- than low-li
ght pea leaves. From these results, we suggest that the greater suscep
tibility of low-light peas to light stress than medium- and high-light
peas is ascribed to lower capacities for both the utilization of abso
rbed light by photosynthesis and for non-radiative dissipation of abso
rbed light as heat.