INFLUENCE OF PHOSPHOLIPID CHAIN-LENGTH ON VEROTOXIN GLOBOTRIAOSYL CERAMIDE BINDING IN MODEL MEMBRANES - COMPARISON OF A SUPPORTED BILAYER FILM AND LIPOSOMES/
S. Arab et Ca. Lingwood, INFLUENCE OF PHOSPHOLIPID CHAIN-LENGTH ON VEROTOXIN GLOBOTRIAOSYL CERAMIDE BINDING IN MODEL MEMBRANES - COMPARISON OF A SUPPORTED BILAYER FILM AND LIPOSOMES/, Glycoconjugate journal, 13(2), 1996, pp. 159-166
The importance of the surrounding lipid environment on the availabilit
y of glycolipid carbohydrate for ligand binding was demonstrated by st
udying the influence of phosphatidylcholine fatty acid chain length on
binding of verotoxins (VT1 and VT2c) to their specific cell surface r
eceptor, globotriaosylceramide (Gb(3)) in the presence of auxiliary li
pids both in a microtitre plate surface bilayer film and in a liposome
membrane model system. In the microtitre assay, both VT1 and VT2c bin
ding to Gb(3) was increased as a function of decreasing PC acyl chain
length likely resulting in increased Gb(3) exposure. In the liposome a
ssay VT1 binding was similarly modulated, however the effect on VT2c b
inding was more complex and did not follow a simple function of increa
sed carbohydrate exposure. Earlier work established that C22:1 and C18
:1Gb(3) fatty acid homologues were the preferred Gb(3) receptor isofor
ms in the microtitre assay for VT1 and VT2c respectively. This selecti
vity was maintained in C16PC containing liposomes, but in C14PC liposo
mes, binding to C22:1Gb(3) (but not C18:1Gb(3)) was elevated such that
this Gb(3) species now became the preferred receptor for both toxins.
This change in verotoxin/Gb(3) homologue binding selectivity in the p
resence of C14PC did not occur in the microtitre bilayer format. These
results are consistent with our proposal that these toxins recognize
different epitopes on the Gb(3) oligosaccharide. We infer that relativ
e availability of these epitopes for toxin binding in an artificial bi
layer is influenced not only by the exposure due to the discrepancy be
tween the fatty acyl chain lengths of Gb(3) and PC, but by the physica
l mode of presentation of the bilayer structure. Such acyl chain lengt
h differences have a more marked effect in a supported bilayer film wh
ereas only the largest discrepancies affect Gb(3) receptor function in
liposomes. The basis of phospholipid modulation of glycolipid carbohy
drate accessibility for receptor function is likely complex and will i
nvolve phase separation, gel/liquid crystalline transition, packing an
d lateral mobility within the bilayer, suggesting that such parameters
should be considered in the assessment of glycolipid receptor functio
n in cells.