The subject of this paper is the political behavior of developing stat
es (the South) on issues of population, environment and development. I
t attempts to understand why the South is so weary of international po
pulation policy in the name of the environment. It argues that the Sou
th's response is shaped by five inter-related concerns about responsib
ility, efficiency, efficacy, additionality, and sovereignty. That is,
the developing countries, (a) do not want their population growth to b
e held responsible for global environmental degradation, (b) argue tha
t a more efficient solution to the environmental crisis is consumption
control in the North, (c) believe that development remains a necessar
y condition for efficacious population control, (d) are weary of the p
opulation priorities of the North distracting international funds from
other developmental goals of the South, and (e) are unprepared to acc
ept any global population norms which challenge their fundamental poli
tical, cultural or religious sovereignty. It is maintained that these
concerns have historically guided the positions of the South and remai
n valid and relevant today. Although, over the last two decades of Nor
th-South debate on the subject the nuances within these concerns have
evolved, the concerns themselves remain valid and were apparent again
at the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development. Fi
nally, it is proposed that although a grand North-South bargain around
population-environment-development issues remains unlikely, both side
s can gain much from trying to understand even where they do not agree
with - the other's concerns. The purpose of this study is not as much
to defend the South's position, as to present it and the rationale be
hind it.