REALISTIC POWER SIMULATIONS COMPARE POINT-BASED AND AREA-BASED DISEASE CLUSTER TESTS

Citation
N. Oden et al., REALISTIC POWER SIMULATIONS COMPARE POINT-BASED AND AREA-BASED DISEASE CLUSTER TESTS, Statistics in medicine, 15(7-9), 1996, pp. 783-806
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Statistic & Probability","Medicine, Research & Experimental","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Statistic & Probability","Medical Informatics
Journal title
ISSN journal
02776715
Volume
15
Issue
7-9
Year of publication
1996
Pages
783 - 806
Database
ISI
SICI code
0277-6715(1996)15:7-9<783:RPSCPA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
One can roughly divide disease cluster tests into area-based (using re gional data) and point-based (using exact locations). We have compared the power of two area-based methods (Moran's I and I(pop), a new met hod) to that of two point-based methods (the Cuzick-Edwards test and G rimson's test), using three realistic simulations of disease (fox rabi es in England, childhood leukaemia in North Humberside, England, and L yme disease in Georgia). The naive belief that point-based methods sho uld be better is not supported: for the complex data simulated here, I (pop) and the Cuzick-Edwards test had higher power than Grimson's met hod or Moran's I. I(pop), capitalizes on high inter-region variabilit y, while Moran's I cannot.