UPPER TROPOSPHERIC OZONE PRODUCTION FOLLOWING MESOSCALE CONVECTION DURING STEP EMEX

Citation
Ke. Pickering et al., UPPER TROPOSPHERIC OZONE PRODUCTION FOLLOWING MESOSCALE CONVECTION DURING STEP EMEX, JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 98(D5), 1993, pp. 8737-8749
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Volume
98
Issue
D5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
8737 - 8749
Database
ISI
SICI code
Abstract
Aircraft data from the Stratosphere-Troposphere Exchange Project (STEP ) and the Equatorial Mesoscale Experiment (EMEX) flights conducted on February 2, 1987, off northern Australia are used in cumulus cloud and photochemical models to determine the effects of convection on upper tropospheric O3 production. Ozone production is calculated as the amou nt integrated over cloud outflow layers for the first 24 hours after c onvection. Ozone production with convection is compared to ozone forma tion in undisturbed conditions. Model simulations of the EMEX 9 convec tive system indicate lower tropospheric air relatively rich in CO and low in NO(x) exiting in cloud outflow, slightly depressing the rate of O3 formation in the middle and upper troposphere. Other convective co mplexes, 800-900 km upstream, caused even greater perturbations to mea sured profiles of CO, NO(x), O3, and H2O and implied a 15-20% reductio n in the rate of O3 production from 14.5 to 17 km. The greatest factor affecting O3 formation in the upper troposphere in the STEP/EMEX flig ht might have been lightning-produced NO(x). We estimate that O3 produ ction from 12 to 17 km is 2-3 times more rapid than it would be with n o lightning. This STEP/EMEX event adds to a climatology of half a doze n cases we have analyzed to determine the effects of convection on fre e tropospheric O3 production. The study region represents the ''mariti me continent'' in contrast to continental regions studied previously. Relatively small quantities of species from the lower troposphere were transported to the upper troposphere because of the relatively weak v ertical velocities in the storm and because chemical species gradients had been minimized by frequent convection prior to the February 2 eve nt. Earlier in the convective season, the chemical consequences of a s ingle episode might have been more substantial.