Nj. Buckley, FOOD FINDING AND THE INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION, LOCAL ENHANCEMENT, ANDCOMMUNAL ROOSTING ON FORAGING SUCCESS OF NORTH-AMERICAN VULTURES, The Auk, 113(2), 1996, pp. 473-488
I investigated foraging behavior and competition for food between Turk
ey Vultures (Cathartes aura) and Black Vultures (Coragyps atratus) in
southern Texas. Turkey Vultures usually located carcasses first, but o
ften were displaced by later-arriving Black Vultures, which used local
enhancement to locate the carcasses. Turkey Vultures occurred equally
frequently at carcasses of all sizes, but Black Vultures were more li
kely to visit large carcasses (>5 kg) than small ones. In addition, at
very large carcasses (>100 kg), Black Vultures outnumbered Turkey Vul
tures. Turkey Vultures apparently depend primarily on small items, whi
ch they can consume quickly before Black Vultures usurp them. Both vul
ture species roost communally and it has been suggested that their roo
sts may function as information centers. However, because recent resea
rch indicates that the information-center hypothesis is unlikely to be
a sufficient explanation for communal roosting in vultures, I explore
d other possible foraging benefits of communal roosting. Specifically,
I incorporated field data collected on the foraging behavior of vultu
res into two simulation models designed to evaluate the possibility th
at communal roosting facilitates the use of local enhancement by roost
members, either by promoting the formation of foraging groups (the as
sembly-point hypothesis) or by concentrating birds in space (the spati
al-concentration hypothesis). I conclude that birds depending on spati
al-concentration effects occasionally may forage more successfully tha
n noncommunally roosting individuals, but those that form foraging gro
ups do best. Thus, communal roosting may be advantageous because it fa
cilitates the formation of foraging groups.