Ca. Frissell et D. Bayles, ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND THE CONSERVATION OF AQUATIC BIODIVERSITY ANDECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY, Water resources bulletin, 32(2), 1996, pp. 229-240
Ecologically effective ecosystem management will require the developme
nt of a robust logic, rationale, and framework for addressing the inhe
rent limitations of scientific understanding. It must incorporate a st
rategy for avoiding irreversible or large-scale environmental mistakes
that arise from social and political forces that tend to promote frag
mented, uncritical, short-sighted, inflexible, and overly optimistic a
ssessments of resource status, management capabilities, and the conseq
uences of decisions and policies. Aquatic resources are vulnerable to
the effects of human activities catchment-wide, and many of the landsc
ape changes humans routinely induce cause irreversible damage (e.g., s
ome species introductions, extinctions of ecotypes and species) or giv
e rise to cumulative, long-term, large-scale biological and cultural c
onsequences (e.g., accelerated erosion and sedimentation, deforestatio
n, toxic contamination of sediments). In aquatic ecosystems, biotic im
poverishment and environmental disruption caused by past management an
d natural events profoundly constrain the ability of future management
to maintain biodiversity and restore historical ecosystem functions a
nd values. To provide for rational, adaptive progress in ecosystem man
agement and to reduce the risk of irreversible and unanticipated conse
quences, managers and scientists must identify catchments and aquatic
networks where ecological integrity has been least damaged by prior ma
nagement, and jointly develop means to ensure their protection as rese
rvoirs of natural biodiversity, keystones for regional restoration, ma
nagement models, monitoring benchmarks, and resources for ecological r
esearch.