Objective: To assess the findings and complications of laparotomies fo
r completely staging presumed early-stage ovarian cancer in patients w
hose initial surgery was inadequate. Methods: Records of 45 patients s
urgically restaged at our institution, after having been incompletely
staged elsewhere, were reviewed for original operative reports, pathol
ogic diagnoses, restaging procedures, operative results, and periopera
tive complications. Results: Initial clinical staging was IA, 28; IB,
three; IC, 12; IIA, one; IIB, one. Histologic distribution was as foll
ows: invasive epithelial, 19 (42%); borderline epithelial, 16 (36%); g
erm cell tumor, seven (16%); and stromal tumor, three (6%). Seven of t
he 45 patients (16%) had their disease reclassified to a more advanced
stage. Of patients with borderline ovarian tumors, two, initially sta
ged as IA, were restaged to IB and IC, and one was restaged from IIB t
o IIIA. Three patients with invasive epithelial adenocarcinoma were re
classified to a higher stage: one, with a presumed stage IC, poorly di
fferentiated adenocarcinoma, to IIIB; one, with a stage IC, grade 2 mu
cinous cystadenocarcinoma, to IIIA; and a third, with a IIA, poorly di
fferentiated adenocarcinoma, to IIIC. A patient with granulosa cell tu
mor, initially staged as IC, was restaged to IIB. Fifteen patients (33
%) had complications after restaging surgery. Seven (16%) patients und
ergoing restaging laparotomy for presumed early ovarian cancer were re
classified to a higher stage, resulting in alteration of treatment for
only one patient. In 18 patients with invasive cancer, the second ope
ration confirmed the presence of low-risk stage IA/B disease, allowing
adjuvant chemotherapy to be withheld. Conclusion: Although restaging
laparotomies provide important prognostic information with minimal mor
bidity, they provide little benefit to those patients already requirin
g chemotherapy based on the original operative findings.