Gm. Cronin et al., THE EFFECTS OF THE GESTATION AND FARROWING ENVIRONMENTS ON SOW AND PIGLET BEHAVIOR AND PIGLET SURVIVAL AND GROWTH IN EARLY LACTATION, Applied animal behaviour science, 46(3-4), 1996, pp. 175-192
The effects of gestation (individual stall vs. group pen) and farrowin
g/lactation (conventional crate vs. prototype pair-pen system for two
sows) treatments on sow and piglet behaviours considered relevant to p
iglet survival were examined in a 2 X 2 factorial experiment involving
96 primiparous crossbred (Large White X Landrace) sows and their litt
ers. The pair-pen system provided each sow with an area of about 10 m(
2) and included a specific farrowing area which contained features imp
ortant for piglet survival similar to those found in farrowing crates,
i.e. small area and heated creep. Sow and piglet behaviour and piglet
survival and growth were measured to Day 8 of lactation. While a grea
ter (P < 0.01) proportion of piglets were alive on Day 8 for sows in t
he gestation stall treatment compared with the gestation pen treatment
(88.6 vs. 83.3% of total born (TB)), mean litter size at birth tended
to be smaller (P < 0.1) in the former treatment (8.6 vs. 9.4 piglets
per sow). Piglet mortality was higher for sows housed in group pens du
ring gestation and crates during farrowing than for sows in the other
treatment combinations. Stillbirths occurred at a rate of 8.4 vs. 4.4%
of TB and deaths of liveborn piglets in the first 3 days occurred at
a rate of 11.0 vs. 6.1% of TB in the gestation pen-farrowing crate tre
atment compared with the other treatments combined. Sows in the crate
treatment compared with those in the pair-pen treatment directed less
behaviour to their piglets (e.g. investigation of piglets: Day 1, 7.2
vs. 10.0% of observations, P < 0.01; vocalisation to piglets: Day 1, 9
.0 vs. 12.2% of observations, P < 0.05) and were less responsive while
feeding at the trough to the loud vocalisations of one of their pigle
ts (e.g. 57 vs. 89% of sows at Day 3 in the crate vs. pair-pen treatme
nts stopped feeding in response to the piglet's vocalisations, P < 0.0
5). The results suggest that the gestation environment had only minima
l, or at most short-term, effects on the behaviour of sows and piglets
in early lactation. In contrast the farrowing environment had marked
effects, particularly on sow behaviour. The present experiment demonst
rates that modifying the farrowing environment affected maternal behav
iour in sows. However, there is little evidence to support the hypothe
sis that increased maternal behaviour was associated with improved pig
let survival.