SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND ACTIVITY IN GROUPS OF MEDITERRANEAN MOUFLON (OVIS-GMELINI) - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY

Citation
Y. Lependu et al., SPATIAL STRUCTURE AND ACTIVITY IN GROUPS OF MEDITERRANEAN MOUFLON (OVIS-GMELINI) - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY, Applied animal behaviour science, 46(3-4), 1996, pp. 201-216
Citations number
64
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
ISSN journal
01681591
Volume
46
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
201 - 216
Database
ISI
SICI code
0168-1591(1996)46:3-4<201:SSAAIG>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
The spatial structure of groups of Mediterranean mouflon was compared during spring/summer in a small population living on a sandy terrace i n eastern Germany and within part of a large. population inhabiting a low mountain in southern France. A similar comparison was also conduct ed throughout the year in the French population. The aim of the study was to define proximate mechanisms participating in the spatial struct ure of the groups. We measured the proximities in the group, distances to nearest neighbours and activity of the individuals according to th eir sex and age. Lambs and females were closer to each other than to t he other individuals on average at both sites and throughout the year (closer in 55-57% of the couples). Lambs tended to be central to the g roups and females peripheral(19 groups with central lambs vs. eight gr oups with peripheral lambs in Niederfinow in spring/summer, P = 0.04). Lambs, yearling males and adult males were closer to peers but some v ariations were found between sites and periods. The distance to the ne arest neighbour was not clearly correlated with the frequency of assoc iation. The proportion of individuals behaving like their nearest neig hbour was higher when the distance between them was short (Niederfinow , spring/summer. N = 8, rho = -0.857; Vialais, autumn/winter: N = 8, r ho = -0.976). This was no longer hue when lambs were excluded from the analyses. Nearest neighbours were close when both were engaged in the same activity other than feeding, they kept a medium distance when bo th were feeding and they were more distant when only one of them was f eeding, The differences between the two populations did not affect the spatial behaviour of the individuals in the groups except for a sligh t tendency of the animals to be closer in the German population. We pr opose an explanation of the spatial structure of the groups based on t he behavioural characteristics of the different sex and age classes an d we discuss the concordance of our results with those found in domest ic species.