L. Sigman et B. Mazer, IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR CHILD ASTHMA - IS THERE A RATIONAL FOR ITS USE, Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology, 76(4), 1996, pp. 299-305
Objective: This paper reviews the literature regarding immunotherapy i
n the management of childhood asthma. Immunotherapy is a well establis
hed treatment of venom allergy and allergic rhinitis, however its use
in asthma remains controversial. Data Sources: We reviewed the pediatr
ic literature from 1966 to 1994 and evaluated the existing studies for
clinical efficacy of immunotherapy in childhood asthma. Study Selecti
on: Only 12 purely pediatric studies existed over the time period that
we reviewed. The studies used a variety of different antigens includi
ng house dust, house dust mite, grass, mold, cat, dog, and combination
s of antigens. Results: In reviewing the studies, we assessed study du
ration, number of subjects, whether it was blinded, placebo controlled
or open labeled, the measures of clinical efficacy and the assessment
s of specific and nonspecific bronchial reactivity. The studies were v
ery heterogeneous, and therefore direct comparison a-nd extrapolation
of conclusions was difficult. The majority of the studies demonstrated
either an improvement in asthmatic symptoms or a decrease in bronchia
l reactivity to the specific antigen employed, or both. The minority o
f studies demonstrated no clinical efficacy. The most consistent evide
nce of benefit was suggested in those trials employing house dust mite
therapy, while immunotherapy for grass and cats demonstrated some ben
efit but the number of studies employing these treatments was very sma
ll. There are no trials that provide convincing evidence that immunoth
erapy with dog and mold antigens is effective for childhood reactive a
irway disease. Conclusion: Asthma is a multifactorial disease with man
y triggers. In establishing a role for immunotherapy one must consider
all the different aspects such as allergic triggers, environmental st
resses, and viral infections. The literature is unclear as to when imm
unotherapy should be initiated for childhood asthma. While there are s
uggestions that immunotherapy should be considered for the child with
mild or moderate asthma and dust mite sensitivity when pharmacotherapy
is not efficacious, the immunomodulatory properties of immunotherapy
may actually be more tailored for early intervention in asthma rather
than for use once symptoms have occurred. More research is required in
order to clarify whether immunotherapy should be recommended more oft
en for the treatment of childhood asthma.