J. Belchihernandez et Fj. Espinosaparra, MANAGEMENT OF ADVERSE REACTIONS TO PROPHYLACTIC TRIMETHOPRIM-SULFAMETHOXAZOLE IN PATIENTS WITH HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS INFECTION, Annals of allergy, asthma, & immunology, 76(4), 1996, pp. 355-358
Background: In hospitals attended by patients with human immunodeficie
ncy virus infection, adverse reactions are often observed to trimethop
rim-sulfamethoxazole, particularly cutaneous reactions. Given the impo
rtance of this drug for prophylaxis we have attempted to establish a d
esensitization or tolerance protocol so that patients can continue the
drug without repeated adverse reactions. Methods: We studied 34 HIV p
atients with adverse cutaneous reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxaz
ole, slight to moderate in nature but not life-threatening. Skin tests
(prick and intradermal) were done in an attempt to rule out a mechani
sm of hypersensitivity. Subsequently, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole wa
s administered orally in increasing doses beginning with trimethoprim,
0.2 mg, and sulfamethoxazole, 1 mg. The same dose was repeated after
12 hours and then doubled every 24 hours until the therapeutic dose wa
s achieved. If adverse reactions appeared we maintained the last dose
administered and administered antihistamines until the reactions clear
ed or improved. Results: None of the patients had positive skin tests
(immediate or delayed). Twenty-seven patients were satisfactorily dese
nsitized. After a follow-up of 3 months, 25 patients were still incide
nt-free on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis, and 19 returning
for check-ups at 6 months could still tolerate the drug well. Conclus
ions: Our data indicate that patients with adverse reactions to trimet
hoprim-sulfamethoxazole can continue prophylactic treatment after oral
desensitization.