This work was undertaken to evaluate the accuracy of wood resistance s
ensors for measurement of relative humidity and to identify sources of
error in this use. Relative humidity can be expressed as a function o
f the logarithm of the sensors electrical resistance and of its temper
ature. We found that single-point calibration of each sensor compensat
es for most between-sensor variation, although care must be exercised
during calibration. With careful calibration readings, error in relati
ve humidity readings made with these sensors can be limited to +/- 10%
relative humidity under most conditions. The literature indicates tha
t a lower degree of error than this is anticipated when electrical res
istance is used to estimate moisture content measurements. Our data su
ggest that sorption hysteresis and sensor memory are significant contr
ibutors to this (+/- 10%) relative humidity error.