We compared the daily expenditure of energy of meadow voles (Microtus
pennsylvanicus) with and without dummy radiocollars. Daily expenditure
of energy was estimated by doubly labelled water, while voles were ke
pt in large outdoor cages. Carrying a radiocollar (6.7-9.0% of body ma
ss) had no effect on daily expenditure of energy. Metabolism of caged
animals was not inferior to that of free-ranging ones, suggesting that
caging did not reduce locomotory costs and that radiocollars do not i
nfluence energy budgets of voles in natural conditions. Subsequently,
we remove a potential argument against the use of telemetry on mammals
of small size. We also validate the simultaneous use of radiotelemetr
y and doubly labelled water in small running mammals, which should off
er new opportunities to investigate ecological energetics of these spe
cies.