C1 BACTERIA IN THE WATER COLUMN OF CHESAPEAKE BAY, USA .1. DISTRIBUTION OF SUBPOPULATIONS OF O2-TOLERANT, OBLIGATELY ANAEROBIC, METHYLOTROPHIC METHANOGENS THAT OCCUR IN MICRONICHES REDUCED BY THEIR BACTERIAL CONSORTS
Jm. Sieburth, C1 BACTERIA IN THE WATER COLUMN OF CHESAPEAKE BAY, USA .1. DISTRIBUTION OF SUBPOPULATIONS OF O2-TOLERANT, OBLIGATELY ANAEROBIC, METHYLOTROPHIC METHANOGENS THAT OCCUR IN MICRONICHES REDUCED BY THEIR BACTERIAL CONSORTS, Marine ecology. Progress series, 95(1-2), 1993, pp. 67-80
Sub-populations of O2-tolerant, obligately anaerobic methanogens were
enriched with monomethylamine (MMA) under 3 different regimens: Regime
n 1, where oxygenated seawater was reduced by the aerobic bacterial co
nsorts of the methanogens in sealed gas-permeable polycarbonate flasks
that apparently prevented the accumulation of hydrogen sulphide while
allowing the production of traces of ethane and ethylene; Regimen 2,
like 1, but with bacterial reduction in glass serum bottles that permi
tted the accumulation of hydrogen sulphide formed by sulphate-reductio
n but not the C2 hydrocarbons; and Regimen 3, an anaerobic medium chem
ically reduced by sodium sulphide and cysteine that is used to culture
methanogens from anoxic sediment. In Regimens 1 and 2, methanogenic b
acterial consortia (MBC) were initiated by MMA-oxidizing bacteria that
formed reduced microzones in which MMA could be cleaved by methylotro
phic methanogens to form methane, which was apparently oxidized by aer
obic methanotrophs almost as quickly as it was produced until dissolve
d oxygen was exhausted. The process was accelerated under Regimen 2, w
hose enrichments were used for the most probable number estimation of
methanogenic particulates which showed that they accumulate in the pyc
nocline. These methanogenic particulates were quite sensitive to filte
r concentration. The distribution of the 3 sub-populations of methanog
ens is then shown at 10 stations along the density gradient of the est
uary where water samples were obtained from the surf ace layer, pycnoc
line and bottom layer of water. The results were similar for each laye
r, where Regimen 2 consistently produced twice the number of methanoge
nic enrichments as obtained with Regimen 1 or 2. In contrast, there wa
s a marked difference in the distribution of the methanogen population
s down the density gradient of the estuary. Enrichment in Regimen 3, w
hich was very successful up the estuary, decreased in effectiveness wi
th increasing density. Enrichments in Regimen 2 were quite effective t
hroughout the transect of stratified waters, while those in Regimen 1
had a narrower distribution. I conclude that O2-tolerant methanogens t
hat occur throughout the water column and peak in the pycnocline grow
in fragile microniches that are reduced by bacteria that either consum
e oxygen, produce hydrogen sulphide, or both. A 'top-down working hypo
thesis is presented that could explain the diversity, nature and distr
ibution of the bacterial components of the methanogernic enrichments o
f the water column, and how the methanogens in anoxic sediments lackin
g aerobic bacterial consorts may be selected from them. I also postula
te that the methanogens living in bacterially reduced microniches may
be unique both physiologically and taxonomically, and may have redox p
otential (Eh) requirements less strict than methanogens from anoxic H2
S-rich sediments.