Estimation of the risk of cancer and other health effects following ex
posure to the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki remains largely
empirical, and the models used to adduce risk incorporate few, if any
, of the advances in molecular biology of the past decade or so. These
facts compromise the estimation of risk where the epidemiologic data
are weakest, namely, at low doses and dose rates. Although the risk es
timates may be sufficient for regulatory purposes, without a better un
derstanding of the molecular and cellular events ionizing radiation in
itiates or promotes, it seems unlikely that the estimates will be as i
ntellectually satisfying as they might be. Nor will the situation impr
ove further without attention to the identification and estimation of
the effects of those host and environmental factors that enhance or di
minish risk of cancer or the effects on the developing brain.