M. Denglerharles et al., THE INFLUENCE OF STIMULUS PARAMETERS ON THE VISUAL-FIELD INDEXES BY AUTOMATED PROJECTION PERIMETRY, Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 231(6), 1993, pp. 337-343
The various stimulus parameters offered by two standard automated proj
ection perimeters [Humphrey Field Analyser 630 (HFA) and Octopus 201],
namely, stimulus size and location and the interaction of adaptation
level and stimulus duration, were compared in a sample of 20 patients
attending a glaucoma clinic using the visual field indices mean defect
(MD), loss variance (LV), short-term fluctuation (SF) and corrected l
oss variance (CLV). LV and SF were greater with Octopus program 32 com
pared with Octopus program G1 (P < 0.02). No difference in the indices
was found between stimulus sizes I and III for HFA program 30-2. MD w
as greater for program 30-2 compared with program 32 (P < 0.002) when
expressed in terms of log (L/DELTAL) whereas LV (P < 0.02) and SF (P <
0.02) were greater for program 32. All differences were considered to
be negligible in the clinical sense.