Pa. Halvorsen et Is. Kristiansen, RADIOLOGY SERVICES FOR REMOTE COMMUNITIES - COST MINIMIZATION STUDY OF TELEMEDICINE, BMJ. British medical journal, 312(7042), 1996, pp. 1333-1336
Objectives-To determine the social costs of providing a rural populati
on with radiology services under three different systems: the existing
system (a small x ray unit at the remote site and all other examinati
ons at the nearest radiology department (the host site)); a teleradiol
ogy system (most examinations at the remote site and more advanced exa
minations at the host site); and all examinations at the host site. De
sign-Cost minimisation study. Setting-Primary health care in a remote
community in Norway. Subjects-A randomly selected sample (n=597) of al
l patients (n=1793) having radiological examinations in 1993. Main out
come measures-Annual direct medical costs, direct non-medical (travel)
costs, and indirect costs (lost production) of the three options. Res
ults-After exclusion of costs common to the three systems the direct m
edical, direct non-medical, and indirect costs of the three options we
re, respectively, pound 9000, pound 51 000, and pound 31 500 (total po
und 91 500) for the existing system; pound 108 000, pound 2000, and po
und 13 500 (total pound 123 500) for the teleradiology option; and pou
nd 0, pound 75 000, and pound 42 000 (pound 117 000 in total) for the
''all at host'' option. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the existi
ng system is the least costly option except when lost leisure is value
d as highly as lost production. Conclusion-The teleradiology option di
d not seem to be cost saving in the study community. Such systems, how
ever, may be justified on the grounds of equity of access and quality
of care.