V. Chyle et al., APOPTOSIS AND DOWNSTAGING AFTER PREOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY FOR MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER-CANCER, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 35(2), 1996, pp. 281-287
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To determine the relationship between pretreatment apoptosis
levels and clinical-to-pathologic down-staging resulting from preopera
tive radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Between 1960-1983, 338 patie
nts were dispositioned to receive preoperative radiotherapy 4-6 weeks
prior to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive transitional cell carc
inoma of the bladder. Of these, adequate hematoxylin and eosin stained
tissue sections for morphologic analysis of apoptosis were available
in 158 patients. These patients were treated to a median dose of 50 Gy
at 2 Gy per fraction. Median follow-up was 90 months. The apoptotic i
ndex (AI) was calculated from the ratio of the number of apoptotic cel
ls divided by the total counted and multiplied by 100. A minimum of 50
0 cells were counted from each patient. Results: The average AI for th
e whole group (n = 158) was 2.0 +/- 1.3 (+/- SD), with a median of 1.8
. The association of AI to clinical stage was significant with AI aver
ages of 1.8 for Stage T2 (n = 56), 1.9 for T3a(iz = 51), and 2.4 for T
3b (p = 0.038, Kendall Correlation). The relationship of AI to radioth
erapy response also was significant with an average of 2.2 for those w
ho were downstaged (n = 103), 1.9 for those in whom the stage remained
unchanged (n = 20), and 1.7 for those who were upstaged (n = 35, p =
0.054, Kendall Correlation). The other significant correlations with A
I were for the factors, grade, mitotic index, number of tumors, and ge
nder. The AI was then categorized into three groups (less than or equa
l to 1, >1, and less than or equal to 3, and >3) to examine the progno
stic significance of this parameter. The distributions of patients by
clinical stage, grade, mitotic index, number of tumors, radiotherapy r
esponse, and hemoglobin level were significantly associated with AI us
ing this grouping. When the analysis of the distribution of patients b
y radiation response and AI was segregated by stage, a significant cor
relation was observed only for those with Stage T3b disease (p = 0.006
); 93% of T3b patients with an AI >3 were downstaged, while in 7% the
stage remained unchanged and none were upstaged. The relationship of A
I to 5-year actuarial patient outcome was investigated using several e
nd points and although no significant correlations were observed, a tr
end was seen for improved survival when AI was >3 (71% vs. 41%,p = 0.0
9) for Stage T3b patients. Conclusion: The AI correlated most strongly
with radiotherapy response for patients with clinical stage T3b disea
se, the one subgroup of patients wherein preoperative radiotherapy is
likely to be of the most benefit. Further investigation of pretreatmen
t apoptosis levels as a marker of anticancer response is needed, espec
ially for patients treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy with the
goal of bladder preservation.