Assessment of the proposed VAN method for predicting earthquakes in Gr
eece remains inconclusive. Authors who have attempted to evaluate the
method have had to make their own subjective decisions about some feat
ures of the hypothesis, and to propose their own algorithms for testin
g against a null hypothesis. Different treatments of the inhomogeneity
in space and time have lead to widely different conclusions. The bino
mial distribution has been misused in considering whether predictions
may have been satisfied ''by chance.'' Objective tests on the performa
nce of the method, using independent data, cannot begin until the VAN
hypothesis and the proposed null hypothesis have been fully formulated
.