Archaeal RNA polymerases show a weak ability in vitro to bind to promo
ter DNA and/or to initiate transcription with low activity independent
of upstream regulatory DNA sequences. Active transcription in vitro a
nd in vivo, however, depends strictly on a TATA box resembling the TAT
A box of eucaryal polII promoters. This TATA box is recognized by a po
lypeptide related to eucaryal TATA-binding protein (TBP) I:hat was for
merly designated aTFB. Template competition studies showed that this a
rchaeal TATA-binding protein (aTBP) is stably sequestered at the promo
ter by interaction with the second archaeal transcription factor, aTFA
, which is related to eucaryal transcription factor IIB (TRIIB). The a
ssociation of archaeal TFIIB (aTFIIB) with the aTBP-promoter complex l
eads to template commitment, indicating that aTFIIB recruits archaeal
RNA polymerase to the preinitiation complex. These analyses suggest th
e following order for assembly of transcription factors on the archaea
l promoter: aTBP, aTFIIB, RNA polymerase, and provide evidence for a c
ommon molecular mechanism of transcription initiation by eucaryal RNA
polymerase II and archaeal RNA polymerases. The sequence of the genes
encoding aTBP and aTFIIB (TFB) showed all the characteristics conserve
d in their eucaryal counterparts. The degree of sequence similarity be
tween archaeal and eucaryal transcription factors is between 27 to 35%
for TFIIB and between 36 to 41% for TBP. The findings discussed here
indicate that TBP and TFIIB perform analogous functions in Archaea and
Eucarya and show that four essential components of archaeal and eucar
yal transcriptional machineries, RNA polymerase, TATA box, TBP and TFI
IB are homologous.