AMERICAN-INDIANS AND THE BURGER COURT

Objective. Like many politically disadvantaged groups, American Indian interests have turned to the courts when they lack access or clout in the electoral process. Unlike many other disadvantaged groups, the li tigation activities of American Indian interests have failed to garner much scholarly attention. The purpose of this research is to examine how American Indian interests fared before the Burger Court (1969-85 O ctober terms). Methods. The 63 full opinion cases regarding issues cri tical to American Indian interests were identified by examining the Un ited States Reports. Each case was coded as whether or not the Court d ecided in favor of the party advancing American Indian interests. Resu lts. American Indian interests won over one-half of the cases decided by the Burger Court during the 1969-85 terms. Additionally, the appell ant status of the parry advancing American Indian interests and the is sue area being litigated were important determinants in the direction of the Burger Court's decisions. Conclusions. While American Indian in terests won more cases than they lost during the 1969-85 terms, the Bu rger Court's decisions did not result in a coherent body of law.