Large manufacturing companies are developing strategies to respond to
changing competitive circumstances. These commonly have their major fo
cus on technology and human resource development through the implement
ation both of new technologies and of corresponding, quality centred a
pproaches to organization. There is a wide range of theoretical and em
pirical research evidence on the creation and espousal of these strate
gies, but, until recently, little on their implementation. This paper
looks at the implementation of strategy in one company renowned for it
s strategic leadership, particularly in the area of new organizational
methods of achieving manufacturing excellence through continuous impr
ovement. Through an examination of its operations in two countries it
is possible to highlight some of these key elements of successful impl
ementation of organizational change. On the basis of this it argues th
at there are some important differences between the characteristics of
the two workforces which have had a profound effect on the implementa
tion of strategic change, and in particular on the degree to which a c
ompany is free to introduce change gradually. Such a survey points to
the need for further comparative analyses of strategic change in two n
ational environments similar to that undertaken here. Copyright (C) 19
96 Elsevier Science Ltd