COMPARISON OF AN AUTOMATED ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY WITH A DIRECT FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TEST AND POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION FOR THE DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS IN DIAGNOSTIC SPECIMENS FROM MALE-PATIENTS
Cyw. Tong et al., COMPARISON OF AN AUTOMATED ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY WITH A DIRECT FLUORESCENT-ANTIBODY TEST AND POLYMERASE CHAIN-REACTION FOR THE DETECTION OF CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS IN DIAGNOSTIC SPECIMENS FROM MALE-PATIENTS, European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases, 15(4), 1996, pp. 336-340
Endourethral swabs and first-pass urine (FPU) samples from 148 male pa
tients were tested for Chlamydia trachomatis by an automated enzyme im
munoassay (EIA) (Vidas; bioMerieux, France), a direct fluorescent anti
body (DFA) test (MicroTrak; Syva, USA) and two polymerase chain reacti
on (PCR) methods. Chlamydia trachomatis was considered present if a sp
ecimen was positive by at least two methods. This expanded criterion i
dentified 27 patients (18%) as truly infected. One of the PCR methods
was most sensitive for both types of specimen. When the recommended cu
t-off value of Vidas was reduced by 50%, its sensitivity on endourethr
al swabs was comparable to that of the DFA test, but the DFA test perf
ormed better with FPU. In general, FPU was suitable only for PCR.