Ej. Stelnicki et Dk. Ousterhout, PREVENTION OF THERMAL TISSUE-INJURY INDUCED BY THE APPLICATION OF POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE TO THE CALVARIUM, The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 7(3), 1996, pp. 192-195
The exothermic reaction produced during the polymerization of polymeth
ylmethacrylate yields temperatures in excess of 180 degrees F (81.4 de
grees C). At these elevated temperatures, significant bone and dural n
ecrosis occurs. In an attempt to prevent thermal injury during craniof
acial surgery, surgeons irrigate the polymerizing implant with cold sa
line, assuming that this will decrease both the absolute temperature e
levation and the duration of the exothermic reaction, making the use o
f methylmethacrylate safe. Unfortunately, no experimental evidence exi
sts to support this claim. To test the safety of methylmethacrylate du
ring craniofacial surgery, we constructed an in vitro model that allow
ed us to measure directly the heat transferred from the methylmethacry
late to the underlying dura or bone during polymerization. In this mod
el, the methylmethacrylate implants were 6 cm in diameter, but they va
ried in thickness. We hypothesized that methylmethacrylate could be sa
fely applied up to a certain thickness, after which the temperature ri
se on the undersurface of the implant would no longer be controlled by
any amount of told saline irrigation, and thermal necrosis would occu
r. We found that without irrigation all implants produced temperatures
in excess of 180 degrees F (81.4 degrees C) internally. This peak tem
perature lasted for approximately 45 seconds and then declined to a ba
seline temperature of 98 degrees F (36.3 degrees C) over 5 to 6 minute
s. Upon irrigation of the implants with cold saline (4 degrees C), the
level and duration of temperature elevation conducted to the underlyi
ng surface varied significantly on the basis of implant thickness. Imp
lants smaller than 5 mm thick produced temperatures on the bone surfac
e of 108 degrees F (41.8 degrees C) for 11 seconds. This temperature c
ontrol was partially lost at 7 mm when the underlying surface reached
a temperature of 134 degrees F (56.1 degrees C) for 15 seconds. Methyl
methacrylate implants with a thickness greater than 7 mm produced temp
eratures of 145 degrees F (62.2 degrees C) for 22 seconds, indicating
that the cold was insufficient to protect against thermal injury. Ther
efore, we conclude that polymethylmethacrylate can be applied safely t
o the skull if the implant is 6 mm thick or smaller. With polymethylme
thacrylate thicker than this, the heat produced during polymerization
cannot be controlled, and thermal necrosis to the underlying tissues i
s inevitable.