SELECTING AN APPROPRIATE MULTIMEDIA AUTHORING LANGUAGE

Authors
Citation
Ef. Rosen et Lc. Petty, SELECTING AN APPROPRIATE MULTIMEDIA AUTHORING LANGUAGE, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 28(2), 1996, pp. 286-290
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental","Psychologym Experimental
ISSN journal
07433808
Volume
28
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
286 - 290
Database
ISI
SICI code
0743-3808(1996)28:2<286:SAAMAL>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
Multimedia is the integration of sound, pictures, videos, and text in such a way that users can navigate, explore, investigate, and create, The essence of multimedia computer-based training (CBT) is the use of conditional branching. Five multimedia authoring programs were compare d: Multimedia Toolbook CBT, Director, Authorware Professional, IconAut hor, Action!, Quest, and Supercard. Comparisons include such factors a s initial cost, distribution costs, platform, metaphor and logic, stre ngths, and support. The most critical factors, and their order of impo rtance, in selecting an authoring language are delivery platform, leve l of interactivity required, need for database connectivity the kind o f support available, and the metaphor. We chose Multimedia Toolbook CB T for our use because of the availability of outside support, low cost , platform, the book metaphor, and similarity to other familiar langua ges (HyperCard and BASIC).