A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-MASKED COMPARISON OF THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF COMBINATION THERAPY WITH LOSARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE VERSUS CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN ELDERLY AND YOUNGER PATIENTS

Citation
Jajh. Critchley et al., A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-MASKED COMPARISON OF THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF COMBINATION THERAPY WITH LOSARTAN AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE VERSUS CAPTOPRIL AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN ELDERLY AND YOUNGER PATIENTS, Current therapeutic research, 57(5), 1996, pp. 392-407
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy","Medicine, Research & Experimental
ISSN journal
0011393X
Volume
57
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
392 - 407
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-393X(1996)57:5<392:ARDCOT>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
A multinational, randomized trial was conducted to compare the antihyp ertensive efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of the angiot ensin II receptor antagonist losartan with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (fixed-dose tablet) with that of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inh ibitor captopril with HCTZ (fixed-dose tablet) in elderly and younger patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, The study consi sted of a 4-week single-masked placebo baseline period followed by a 1 2-week double-masked, parallel comparison of once-daily administration of losartan 50 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or captopril 50 mg/HCTZ 25 mg (2:1 ran domization ratio), Patients with a mean trough sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) of 95 to 115 mm Hg after the placebo baseline period were randomly assigned to receive losartan/HCTZ (n = 216) or captopri l/HCTZ (n = 109), At each center, patients were stratified according t o age (<65 and greater than or equal to 65 years), The primary efficac y variable was the mean change from baseline to week 12 in trough SiDB P. Safety was assessed by recording adverse experiences and clinical l aboratory measurements. At week 12, mean reductions from baseline in t rough sitting systolic blood pressure and SiDBP were comparable in the losartan/HCTZ (21.5 and 12.6 mm Hg, respectively) and captopril/HCTZ (20.6 and 13.4 mm Hg, respectively) groups, Both fixed-dose combinatio ns had an equal response regardless of the age of the patient, At week 12, a similar percentage of patients in the losartan/HCTZ and captopr il/HCTZ groups had a trough SiDBP less than 90 mm Hg or a 10 mm Hg or greater reduction from baseline (71% and 75%, respectively). Significa ntly fewer patients in the losartan/HCTZ group had clinical adverse ex periences that were considered drug related by the investigator (9% vs 18%), The incidences of cough and headache also were much less in the losartan/HCTZ group, Captopril/HCTZ was associated with significantly greater mean elevations in serum creatinine and uric acid and mean de creases in serum potassium. We concluded that once-daily administratio n of losartan 50 mg and HCTZ 12.5 mg as a fixed-dose tablet is an effe ctive regimen for both elderly and younger patients with mild-to-moder ate essential hypertension. The antihypertensive efficacy of the losar tan 50 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg combination is comparable to that of the captop ril 50 mg/HCTZ 25 mg combination, but losartan/HCTZ has a more favorab le safety, tolerability, and metabolic profile.