ANISOTROPY MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED BY FRACTAL ANALYSIS OF TRABECULAR BONE AT THE CALCANEUS AND RADIUS

Citation
E. Lespessailles et al., ANISOTROPY MEASUREMENTS OBTAINED BY FRACTAL ANALYSIS OF TRABECULAR BONE AT THE CALCANEUS AND RADIUS, Revue du rhumatisme, 63(5), 1996, pp. 337-343
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology
Journal title
ISSN journal
11698446
Volume
63
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
337 - 343
Database
ISI
SICI code
1169-8446(1996)63:5<337:AMOBFA>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
The resistance of bone tissue is influenced not only by bone density p arameters but also by bone architecture parameters, such as the microa rchitecture and anisotropy of trabecular bone. We have developed and v alidated a fractal analysis method for studying bone microarchitecture on roentgenograms. This technique provides reproducible measurements of the fractal dimension (D) of bone, which reflects bone texture. The fractal dimension is determined in 36 different directions; the mean of these 36 values is representative of the image. A polar diagram giv es the value of D according to the angle of analysis. By decomposing t his diagram using polar Fourier Transform analysis, the parameters rel ated to the shape of the polar diagram can be determined. This diagram image analysis technique has been used for other similar diagrams and applied to the results of our fractal analysis method. Diagram shape characterization may provide information on the angular distribution o f results and therefore on the anisotropy of the images under study. T he purpose of this study was to compare roentgenograms of the calcaneu s and radius in the same subjects to determine whether texture and ani sotropy parameters discriminated between these two bones, Roentgenogra ms of the calcaneus and radius were obtained in ten nonosteoporotic su bjects. The radius had a smaller fractal dimension than the calcaneus (mean+/-standard deviation: 1.215+/-0.025 and 1.285+/-0.066, respectiv ely; p=0.014). Differences in the shape of the polar diagram were foun d between the two bones. The mean Fourier coefficient ratio C2/C4 was considerably smaller at the calcaneus (0.63+/-0.50) than at the radius (4.88+/-3.45; p=0.005). Our method allows quantitative characterizati on of texture and anisotropy differences between the calcaneus and rad ius. The smaller fractal dimension of the radius probably reflects the simpler architecture of (his non weight-bearing bone. The differences in polar diagram shape allow to evaluate anisotropy differences betwe en the calcaneus and radius.