This review attempts to deal with two major questions concerning asbes
tos-induced lung disease: How does inhaled asbestos cause cell prolife
ration and fibrosis? and Will there continue to be risk from exposure
to asbestos in schools and public buildings? The first is a scientific
question that has spawned many interesting new experiments over the p
ast 10 years, and there appear to be two hypothetical schemes which co
uld explain, at least in part, the fibroproliferative effects of asbes
tos fibers. One supports the view that toxic oxygen radicals generated
on fiber surfaces and/or intracellularly are the central mediators of
disease. The second hypothesis is not mutually exclusive of the first
, but, in my opinion, may be integral to it, i.e., the cellular injury
induced by oxygen radicals stimulates the elaboration of multiple var
ieties of growth factors and cytokines that mediate the pathogenesis o
f asbestosis. There is increasing evidence that molecules such as plat
elet-derived growth factor and transforming growth factor beta, both s
ynthesized and secreted by activated lung macrophages, are responsible
, respectively, for the increased interstitial cell populations and ex
tracellular matrix proteins that are the hallmarks of asbestos-induced
fibrosis. The challenge today is to establish which combinations of t
he many factors released actually are playing a role in disease pathog
enesis. The issue of continued risk currently is more a question of po
licy and perception than science because a sufficient database has not
yet been established to allow full knowledge of the circumstances und
er which asbestos in buildings constitutes an ongoing health hazard. T
he litigious nature of this question does not help its resolution. In
as much as public policy statements and risk assessment are not within
my purview, I have focused on the state-of-the-art of asbestos as a c
omplete carcinogen. It appears to be generally nongenotoxic, but all a
sbestos fiber tv pes can induce chromosomal mutations and aneuploidy,
perhaps through their ability to disrupt normal chromosome segregation
.