TYPING OF RHIZOBIA BY PCR DNA-FINGERPRINTING AND PCR-RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS OF CHROMOSOMAL AND SYMBIOTIC GENE REGIONS - APPLICATION TO RHIZOBIUM-LEGUMINOSARUM AND ITS DIFFERENT BIOVARS
G. Laguerre et al., TYPING OF RHIZOBIA BY PCR DNA-FINGERPRINTING AND PCR-RESTRICTION FRAGMENT LENGTH POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS OF CHROMOSOMAL AND SYMBIOTIC GENE REGIONS - APPLICATION TO RHIZOBIUM-LEGUMINOSARUM AND ITS DIFFERENT BIOVARS, Applied and environmental microbiology, 62(6), 1996, pp. 2029-2036
Characterization of 43 strains of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovars vici
ae, trifolii, and phaseoli was performed by two methodologies based on
PCR amplification, i.e., PCR DNA fingerprinting of interrepeat sequen
ces and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of PC
R-amplified chromosomal and symbiotic gene regions, Groupings generate
d by PCR DNA fingerprinting with either extragenic palindromic repetit
ive primers or two different single random primers were correlated wit
h similar levels of resolution, Although less discriminating, PCR-RFLP
analysis of intergenic spacer between genes coding for 16S and 23S rR
NA (16S and 23S rDNA) yielded intraspecific polymorphisms. The classif
ication of strains was independent of the biovar status and was in agr
eement with those obtained by PCR DNA fingerprinting. Intrabiovar vari
ation within symbiotic gene regions was detected by PCR-RFLP analysis
of nifDK and nodD gene regions, but the strains were grouped according
to their biovar, The rDNA intergenic spacer and nif primers were veri
fied to be universal for rhizobial species by testing of various refer
ence strains, whereas the nod primers designed in this study were biov
ar or species specific for R. leguminosarum and Rhizobium etli. Classi
fications of R. leguminosarum strains by the PCR-based methods were co
rrelated with those previously obtained by conventional total DNA rest
riction profile comparisons and RFLP analysis using chromosomal and sy
mbiotic gene probes, Ranges of discriminating powers were also equival
ent between the two approaches, However, the PCR-based methods are muc
h less time-consuming and are therefore more convenient.