This paper responds to recent criticisms in Biological Conservation of
heuristic reserve selection algorithms. These criticisms primarily co
ncern the fact that heuristic algorithms cannot guarantee an optimal s
olution to the problem of representing a group of targeted natural fea
tures in a subset of the sites in a region. We discuss optimality in t
he context of a range of needs for conservation planning. We point out
that classical integer linear programming methods that guarantee an o
ptimal solution, like branch and bound algorithms, are currently intra
ctable for many realistic problems. We also show that heuristics have
practical advantages over classical methods and that suboptimality is
not necessarily a disadvantage for many real-world applications. Furth
er work on alternative reserve selection algorithms is certainly neede
d, but the necessary criteria for assessing their utility must be broa
der than mathematical optimality. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science
Limited.