R. Stasi et al., INTENSIVE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS AGE 60 YEARS AND OLDER WITH DE-NOVO ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA - ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS, Cancer, 77(12), 1996, pp. 2476-2488
BACKGROUND. This study aimed to define pre-treatment parameters with p
rognostic significance in elderly patients with de novo acute myeloid
leukemia (AML) who were treated with aggressive regimens. METHODS. We
analyzed, retrospectively, the clinical and laboratory features of 159
consecutive patients age >60 years with AML. Ninety-two patients pres
enting as de novo AML were considered suitable for aggressive chemothe
rapy according to inclusion criteria not different from those commonly
used for younger adults. They belonged to all of the French-American-
British classification types except M3, and their median age was 67 pe
ars (range: 60-79). Antileukemic treatment consisted of 1 of 3 sequent
ial protocols adopted at the S. Eugenio University Hospital of Rome be
tween 1987 and 1993. The three therapeutic groups were similar in numb
er and presenting characteristics. In addition to arabinosylcytosine,
induction schedules included mitoxantrone (Groups I and II) or daunoru
bicin (Group III), and etoposide (Groups I and III). Once in complete
remission (CR), patients were consolidated with two other courses of c
hemotherapy using reduced dosages of the same drugs given during induc
tion. RESULTS. Induction treatment achieved a 52.2% CR rate, with medi
an remission duration and event free survival (EFS) of 35 and 27 weeks
, respectively. Because no significant differences between the results
of the three therapeutic groups were observed, ail cases were pooled
io evaluate the prognostic factors, In univariate analysis, the only p
resenting characteristic significantly associated with failure of indu
ction treatment was age >67 years (P = 0.007), Factors associated with
an increased likelihood of shorter remission duration were CD7 expres
sion on leukemic cells (P = 0.007) and an abnormal karyotype (P = 0.01
0); those predicting shorter EFS were a chromosomal status other than
normal (P = 0.002) and detection of CD14 antigen (P = 0.008). Logistic
regression results identified age and CD14 expression as the variable
s with independent prognostic impact on CR achievement. In a stepwise
proportional hazards general linear model, CD7 and karyotype retained
their predictive value regarding remission duration, whereas the karyo
typic pattern at diagnosis and CD14 antigen expression were the most i
mportant determinants of EFS, with age showing a borderline statistica
l value. A simple ''risk factor score'' was developed that would allow
for stratification of patients into prognostic groups. CONCLUSIONS. C
ytogenetic analysis and immunophenotyping might help to select elderly
patients with AML who have little benefit from current therapeutic st
rategies and with whom new approaches might be experimented. (C) 1996
American Cancer Society.