SYNTHESIS, ABSOLUTE-CONFIGURATION, AND BIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF THE ENANTIOMERS OF OLYL-2,3-DIHYDRO-1,4-BENZODIOXIN-2-YL)METHYL]AMINE (MEPHENDIOXAN), A POTENT COMPETITIVE ALPHA(1A)-ADRENOCEPTOR ANTAGONIST
W. Quaglia et al., SYNTHESIS, ABSOLUTE-CONFIGURATION, AND BIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF THE ENANTIOMERS OF OLYL-2,3-DIHYDRO-1,4-BENZODIOXIN-2-YL)METHYL]AMINE (MEPHENDIOXAN), A POTENT COMPETITIVE ALPHA(1A)-ADRENOCEPTOR ANTAGONIST, Journal of medicinal chemistry, 39(11), 1996, pp. 2253-2258
The enantiomers of olyl-2,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodioxin-2-yl)methyl]amine
(mephendioxan, 2) were synthesized from the chiral 3-p-tolyl-2,3-dihyd
ro-1,4-benzodioxin-2-carboxylic acids [(+)-3 and (-)-3] which in turn
were obtained through the resolution of the racemic acid with (R)- and
(S)-alpha-methylbenzylamine. Comparison of CD spectra of the enantiom
ers of 2 with that of (2S,3S)-3-methyl-2-phenyl-1,4-benzodioxane allow
ed the assignment of the 2S,3S configuration to the (-)-enantiomer of
2 and of the 2R,3R configuration to the other enantiomer. The binding
profile of the enantiomers of 2 was assessed at alpha(1), alpha(2), D-
2, and 5-HT1A receptors, in comparison to WB 4101 (1), 5-methylurapidi
l, and (+)-niguldipine. In addition, the two enantiomers were investig
ated at native and cloned alpha(1)-adrenoreceptor subtypes. (-)-2 was
10-30 times as potent as the (+)-enantiomer at alpha(1)-adrenoreceptor
subtypes in both functional and binding assays. It was 36-fold select
ive for the alpha(1A)- versus alpha(1B)-adrenoreceptor and 60- and 20-
fold selective in binding to the alpha(1a)-adrenoreceptor relative to
alpha(1b) and alpha(1d) subtypes, respectively. Furthermore, the enant
iomer (-)-2 displayed selectivities of 12000-, 2500-, and 250-fold in
binding to alpha(1a)-adrenoreceptors relative to alpha(2)-adrenorecept
ors and 5-HT1A and D-2 receptors. These results indicate that (-)-2 ma
y be a valuable tool in the characterization of alpha(1)-adrenorecepto
r subtypes.