In many predator-prey systems, prey individuals make transitions betwe
en vulnerable and invulnerable states or locations. The invulnerable (
or less vulnerable) class can be individuals occupying a spatial refug
e or those engaged in activities that greatly reduce the risk of preda
tion. Simple models are used to show that transitions between such cla
sses have the following consequences: (1) equilibrium prey density inc
reases as the conditions of prey growth are improved and (2) enrichmen
t often cannot destabilize systems with stable equilibrium densities a
nd may stabilize systems that are undergoing limit cycle oscillations.
Transitions to and from invulnerable states therefore represent a pos
sible explanation for the lack of examples of destabilization via fert
ilization (''the paradox of enrichment'') in nature. Other theoretical
reasons for the apparent absence of the paradox of enrichment are rev
iewed, and methods of distinguishing the different mechanisms are disc
ussed.