RESPONSE OF GIANT SEQUOIA CANOPY FOLIAGE TO ELEVATED CONCENTRATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC OZONE

Citation
Ne. Grulke et al., RESPONSE OF GIANT SEQUOIA CANOPY FOLIAGE TO ELEVATED CONCENTRATIONS OF ATMOSPHERIC OZONE, Tree physiology, 16(6), 1996, pp. 575-581
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Ecology,Forestry,"Plant Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
0829318X
Volume
16
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
575 - 581
Database
ISI
SICI code
0829-318X(1996)16:6<575:ROGSCF>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
We examined the physiological response of foliage in the upper third o f the canopy of 125-year-old giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum B uchholz.) trees to a 61-day exposure to 0.25x, 1x, 2x or 3x ambient oz one concentration. Four branch exposure chambers, one per ozone treatm ent, were installed on 1-m long secondary branches of each tree at a h eight of 34 m. No visible symptoms of foliar ozone damage were apparen t throughout the 61-day exposure period and none of the ozone treatmen ts affected branch growth. Despite the similarity in ozone concentrati ons in the branch chambers within a treatment, the trees exhibited dif ferent physiological responses to increasing ozone uptake. Differences in diurnal and seasonal patterns of g(s) among the trees led to a 2-f old greater ozone uptake in tree No. 2 compared with trees Nos. 1 and 3. Tree No. 3 had significantly higher CER and g(s) at 0.25x ambient o zone than trees Nos. I and 2, and g(s) and CER of tree No. 3 declined with increasing ozone uptake. The y-intercept of the regression for da rk respiration versus ozone uptake was significantly lower for tree No . 2 than for trees Nos. 1 and 3. In the 0.25x and 1x ozone treatments, the chlorophyll concentration of current-year foliage of trees Nos. 1 and 2 was significantly higher than that of current-year foliage of t ree No. 3. Chlorophyll concentration of current-year foliage on tree N o. 1 did not decline with increasing ozone uptake. In all trees, total needle water potential decreased with increasing ozone uptake, but tu rgor was constant. Although tree No. 2 had the greatest ozone uptake, g(s) was highest and foliar chlorophyll concentration was lowest in tr ee No. 3 in the 0.25x and 1x ambient atmospheric ozone treatments.