AN ANIMAL-MODEL OF BENIGN BILE-DUCT STRICTURE, SCLEROSING CHOLANGITISAND CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA AND THE ROLE OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR IN DUCTAL PROLIFERATION
Re. Cheifetz et al., AN ANIMAL-MODEL OF BENIGN BILE-DUCT STRICTURE, SCLEROSING CHOLANGITISAND CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA AND THE ROLE OF EPIDERMAL GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR IN DUCTAL PROLIFERATION, CAN J SURG, 39(3), 1996, pp. 193-197
OBJECTIVE: To adapt an animal model of benign bile-duct stricture, scl
erosing cholangitis and cholangiocarcinoma in order to determine if th
e expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) could be used
to differentiate these lesions. DESIGN: A prospective control study wi
th blinded interpretation of liver biopsy histology and immunohistoche
mical staining as the criterion standards. SETTING: A university-affil
iated research centre. SUBJECTS: Male Syrian Golden hamsters (40 for b
enign duct stricture, 29 for sclerosing cholangitis and 27 for cholang
iocarcinoma). INTERVENTIONS: Ligation of the common bile duct with 6-0
catgut for benign duct stricture; injection of the biliary tree with
0.15 mL of formalin for sclerosing cholangitis; and weekly subcutaneou
s injections of 500 mg/kg of di-isopropanolnitrosamine for 10 weeks fo
llowed by ligation of the common bile duct with 6-0 catgut for cholang
iocarcinoma. Routine histologic preparation of liver biopsies obtained
at autopsy 10 weeks postoperatively then immunohistochemical staining
of specimens for EGFr. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The development of beni
gn or atypical biliary ductal proliferation, including adenoma and car
cinoma formation. The presence or absence of immunohistochemical stain
ing for EGFr. RESULTS: Benign ductal proliferation without atypia was
seen in 15 of 21 animals in the bile-duct-stricture group that were sa
crificed, in 15 of 24 animals in the sclerosing cholangitis group and
in 17 of 18 animals in the cholangiocarcinoma group. Atypical prolifer
ation was seen in 13 of 18 animals with cholangiocarcinoma but not in
the other two groups. The differential occurrence of atypical ductal p
roliferation was statistically significant (p < 0.00001) for both grou
ps. No evidence of EGFr expression was found in any group. CONCLUSION:
Although the animal model was valid histologically for comparing beni
gn and malignant biliary disease, EGFr does not play a role in biliary
ductal proliferation and so cannot be used to differentiate between b
enign and malignant lesions.