Cp. Wilkinson et al., 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF FELLOW EYES OF INDIVIDUALS WITH OCULAR HISTOPLASMOSIS AND UNILATERAL EXTRAFOVEAL OR JUXTAFOVEAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION, Archives of ophthalmology, 114(6), 1996, pp. 677-688
Objectives: To document the incidence of choroidal neovascularization
(CNV) in unaffected fellow eyes among individuals with ocular histopla
smosis and extrafoveal or juxtafoveal CNV in 1 eye; to determine wheth
er the location and type of ''histo spots'' in the macula predict the
site of future CNV development in second eyes; to describe changes ove
r time in neovascular lesions present in fellow eyes at baseline; and
to describe changes in visual acuity of fellow eyes with and without C
NV at baseline. Design, Patients, and Setting: Five-year prospective f
ollow-up study of fellow eyes of 516 patients enrolled in 2 randomized
clinical trials of laser photocoagulation of extrafoveal and juxtafov
eal CNV. Best-corrected visual acuity and reading vision were measured
, and both maculas were photographed at baseline and at 6-month interv
als. Main Outcome Measures: Cumulative incidence of CNV in fellow eyes
free of neovascular maculopathy at the time of study enrollment, 5-ye
ar change in visual acuity of fellow eyes from baseline, and incidence
of legal blindness (visual acuity less than or equal to 20/200 in the
better eye). Results: Photographically documented CNV developed in 35
(9%) of 394 eyes initially free of neovascular maculopathy; neverthel
ess, good visual acuity was maintained in most newly affected eyes unt
il the end of the 5-year follow-up period. Histo spots of any type in
the macula at baseline tripled the risk for later development of CNV i
n comparison to eyes without histo spots in the macula. Although the t
ype of histo spots present in the central macula at baseline did not p
redict future CNV development, in 32 of 35 second eyes in which CNV de
veloped and in 7 of 9 fellow eyes in which a second area of CNV develo
ped during follow-up, CNV was preceded by an ''atypical'' histo spot i
n the same location. Among 122 patients who had bilateral neovascular
maculopathy initially, 100 were examined 5 years later; 8 (8%) were le
gally blind, compared with 3 (1%) of 339 patients examined who had uni
lateral CNV initially. At the 5-year examination, 355 (81%) of 439 pat
ients examined had a visual acuity of 20/20 or better in at least 1 ey
e, including 74 (55%) of 134 patients who had bilateral neovascular ma
culopathy. Conclusions: Although the incidence of CNV in fellow eyes t
hat initially were unaffected remained low throughout 5 years of follo
w-up, it persisted at a nearly constant rate. The risk of legal blindn
ess was low, even for patients who had bilateral involvement. Perhaps
most important, 81% of all patients followed up for 5 years retained a
visual acuity of 20/20 in at least 1 eye, and 20% retained this visua
l acuity in both eyes. Retrospective review of photographs suggests th
at the ophthalmologist should pay special attention to areas of the ce
ntral macula in which new ''atypical'' histo spots are observed, with
the goal of treating CNV that may develop in the same area at a time w
hen the benefits of laser treatment may be greatest.