SOMATOTROPHINOMAS IN MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA TYPE-1 - A REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHENOTYPE AND INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR-I LEVELS IN A LARGE MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA TYPE-1 KINDRED
Jr. Burgess et al., SOMATOTROPHINOMAS IN MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA TYPE-1 - A REVIEW OF CLINICAL PHENOTYPE AND INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH-FACTOR-I LEVELS IN A LARGE MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA TYPE-1 KINDRED, The American journal of medicine, 100(5), 1996, pp. 544-547
PURPOSE: Within the spectrum of pituitary disease in multiple endocrin
e neoplasia type 1 [MEN-1), widely disparate prevalence rates for soma
totrophinomas have been described. Studies that combine multiple, smal
l MEN-1 kindreds report pituitary disease in 60% to 65% of patients, s
omatotrophinomas accounting for 27% to 37% of total pituitary lesions.
However, reports based on targe MEN-1 family screening programs have
produced lower prevalence rates for pituitary adenomas (9% to 40%), of
which somatotrophinomas comprise up to 14%. We sought to determine th
e prevalence of both biochemical and clinically overt growth hormone (
GH) hypersecretion in the largest reported MEN-1 genealogy, the Tasman
1 kindred. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Tasman 1 MEN-1 kindred contains
165 members with established MEN-1. We reviewed-the records of 124 MEN
-1 patients for evidence of acromegaly or gigantism. To determine if c
linical criteria underestimate the occurrence of biochemical GH hypers
ecretion, a subset of 33 patients was assessed for elevated levels of
serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). RESULTS: NO cases of acrom
egaly or gigantism were detected in the 124 patients reviewed. Of the
33 patients screened with IGF-1, 13 had previously diagnosed pituitary
lesions-11 prolactinomas and 2 nonsecretory lesions. The IGF-1 levels
were normal in all patients studied. There were no significant differ
ences in mean IGF-1 values between patients with and without pituitary
lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This report represents the largest study of gro
wth hormone secretion patterns thus far described in MEN-1. The appare
nt absence of somatotrophinomas in a kindred of this size is unexpecte
d. These results support the existence of kindred-specific MEN-1 pheno
types. We conclude that the pathogenesis of GH-secreting adenomas in M
EN-1 is influenced by secondary factors acting in synergy with the wel
l-documented primary MEN-1 gene defect on chromosome 11q13.