Ahs. Hassen et Rj. Cade, A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY, Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery, 66(3), 1996, pp. 178-180
Background: An assessment of the value of laparoscopic appendicectomy
was performed, Methods: During 1993, all patients above the age of 13
years admitted with clinical appendicitis to Box Hill Hospital were as
signed to an open or laparoscopic procedure depending on whether the s
urgeon on call was an 'open' or 'laparoscopic' surgeon for the purpose
of the study. Ninety-two patients were entered in the study, of whom
57 were in the open group. The rare of histologically proven appendici
tis was 73.9%. Results: No significant difference between the groups w
as found in the use of narcotic analgesia. length of stay or incidence
of wound infection. However, operating time was significantly longer
in the laparoscopic group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendicectomy on
an unselected group of patients does not confer many advantages but l
aparoscopy may be beneficial in certain subgroups.