A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

Citation
Ahs. Hassen et Rj. Cade, A PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY, Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery, 66(3), 1996, pp. 178-180
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00048682
Volume
66
Issue
3
Year of publication
1996
Pages
178 - 180
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-8682(1996)66:3<178:APTOOV>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Background: An assessment of the value of laparoscopic appendicectomy was performed, Methods: During 1993, all patients above the age of 13 years admitted with clinical appendicitis to Box Hill Hospital were as signed to an open or laparoscopic procedure depending on whether the s urgeon on call was an 'open' or 'laparoscopic' surgeon for the purpose of the study. Ninety-two patients were entered in the study, of whom 57 were in the open group. The rare of histologically proven appendici tis was 73.9%. Results: No significant difference between the groups w as found in the use of narcotic analgesia. length of stay or incidence of wound infection. However, operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic appendicectomy on an unselected group of patients does not confer many advantages but l aparoscopy may be beneficial in certain subgroups.