Mj. Zinaman et al., EVALUATION OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED SEMEN ANALYSIS (CASA) WITH IDENT STAIN TO DETERMINE SPERM CONCENTRATION, Journal of andrology, 17(3), 1996, pp. 288-292
This study was undertaken to compare a new fluorescent stain-based com
puter-assisted semen analysis (CASA) system (IDENT) for determining hu
man sperm concentration to the manual hemacytometric method and to con
ventional CASA (CASA-CONV). Normal healthy semen donors as well as pat
ients provided samples that were evaluated for sperm concentration wit
h the CASA-IDENT method, the hemacytometer method and CASA-CONV. Each
field was examined visually to determine the sources of overcounting a
nd undercounting for the two CASA methods;four ranges of sperm concent
ration were examined: 0-10, > 10-30, > 30-100, and > 100 x 10(6)/ml. T
he main outcome measures were sperm concentration, debris counted as s
perm, and missed sperm. Our results showed that significantly more deb
ris was counted as sperm and more sperm were missed with CASA-CONV tha
n CASA-IDENT. As the sperm density increased, so did the number of cou
nting errors for the CASA-CONV system. The error rate was much greater
using CASA-CONV (12.1 +/- 42.2%) than with CASA-IDENT (0.4 +/- 0.7%)
when compared to hemacytometer counts (P = 0.068). We conclude that th
e CASA-IDENT method of sperm counting is highly accurate and less time
-consuming when compared to the hemacytometer method. There are signif
icant differences in the amount of debris counted as sperm and number
of missed sperm between CASA-CONV and CASA-IDENT with varying sperm de
nsity. With both parameters, the counts are more accurate using the CA
SA-IDENT method.