Jl. Pedersen et al., ANALGESIC AND ANTIINFLAMMATORY EFFECTS OF LIGNOCAINE-PRILOCAINE (EMLA) CREAM IN HUMAN BURN INJURY, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 76(6), 1996, pp. 806-810
Pain relief may be improved by reducing sensitization of nociceptive p
athways caused by tissue injury. Such a reduction depends mainly on in
hibition of local inflammatory changes and the relation between durati
on of nociceptive block and nociceptive input. In this study we examin
ed if prolonged topical treatment with local anaesthetics could reduce
late hyperalgesia and local inflammation after burn injury in healthy
volunteers. The effects of EMLA treatment for 8 h after burn on hyper
algesia, inflammation and wound healing were compared with the contral
ateral placebo-treated leg for 48 h after bilateral burn injuries (15
x 25 mm, 49 degrees C for 5 min) in a double-blind, randomized study i
n 12 healthy volunteers. Wound healing was studied 1 and 2 weeks after
injury. Neither mechanical nor thermal primary hyperalgesia were affe
cted significantly by prolonged EMLA treatment. Secondary hyperalgesia
and skin erythema were also not changed. Seven of 12 placebo-treated
legs developed blisters, in contrast with four of 12 EMLA-treated legs
. Wound healing showed no apparent differences. Our data suggest that
prolonged, topical treatment with local anaesthetics did not reduce lo
cal inflammation and late hyperalgesia.