Ka. Pierce et al., THE SOURCES OF CHILDRENS ERRORS DURING NONISOMORPHIC ANALOGICAL TRANSFER - SCRIPT THEORY AND STRUCTURE MAPPING-THEORY, Journal of experimental child psychology, 62(1), 1996, pp. 102-130
Nonisomorphic analogical transfer and procedural change were examined
among 96 second and third graders. Hybrid versions of missionaries/can
nibals and jealous husbands problems were used to provide three acquis
ition and two transfer tasks that were combined factorially, yielding
six combinations. New constraints were added in transfer that altered
the problem space and complicated the task. The amount of base modific
ation that was required in transfer varied across conditions. In each
condition the children were quite adept at applying their base to a no
nisomorphic target at most choice points, despite the differences in p
roblem descriptions, constraints, and problem spaces. For example, the
ir response times on the first two moves in transfer were comparable t
o those obtained in isomorphic transfer. However, on specific moves th
at required base modification many of the children appeared confused,
making two or more consecutive errors. The source of the errors seemed
to stem from an inability of the children in some conditions to incor
porate additional constraints into the structure of their existing bas
e. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.