We report six experiments, involving nearly 1000 subjects, that invest
igate people's tendency to indicate ''I knew it all along'' with refer
ence to facts that we are sure they would not have recalled without be
nefit of study. Subjects studied factual statements before doing a gen
eral knowledge test, ''knew-it'' subjects were told to write only the
answers they would have recalled without benefit of study, bur they wr
ote about 20% too many answers; based on this finding. we would conclu
de that people mistake recently learned answers for previous knowledge
. However. ''learned-it'' subjects, who were told to write only answer
s they learned during the experiment, tended to write the correct numb
er; given this finding, we would conclude that people have an excellen
t ability to discriminate between the two sources of available answers
. The two conclusions can't both be right, Either people have the need
ed information in mind, but the knew-it test distracts them from it, o
r they don't, but can adopt strategies for the learned-it test that gi
ve accurate performance. We conclude it's a bit of both. (C) 1996 Acad
emic Press, Inc.