M. Viluksela et al., TOXICOKINETICS OF 2,3,7,8-TETRACHLORODIBENZO-P-DIOXIN (TCDD) IN 2 SUBSTRAINS OF MALE LONG-EVANS RATS AFTER INTRAVENOUS-INJECTION, Fundamental and applied toxicology, 31(2), 1996, pp. 184-191
Toxicokinetics of a nontoxic intravenous dose of C-14-labeled TCDD wer
e studied in two substrains of Long-Evans (L-E) rats with a fivefold d
ifference in sensitivity in terms of TCDD-induced mortality. The Turku
/AB Long-Evans rat (T L-E) is the most sensitive rat strain with an or
al LD50 of 17.7 mu g/kg, whereas the Charles River Long-Evans rat (CR
L-E) is a more resistant strain (oral LD50 95.2 mu g/kg). Samples of 1
8 tissues were collected 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 days after dosing and
analyzed for radioactivity. Body weight and fecal and urinary excretio
n of radioactivity were monitored daily during the 32-day study period
. CR L-E rats grew significantly faster than T L-E Fats, increasing th
eir body weight by 60% in 32 days compared with only 16% in T L-E rats
. This difference was not caused by toxicity, because the weight gain
was identical in control and TCDD-treated rats of both substrains. Tis
sue concentrations of [C-14]TCDD-associated radioactivity and area und
er the curve (AUC) values were lower in CR L-E than in T L-E rats. The
nest pronounced differences were found in thymus, white adipose tissu
e, brown adipose tissue, and adrenals. The decrease of TCDD concentrat
ion in tissues was faster in CR L-E than in T L-E rats, whereas fecal
and urinary excretion was faster in T L-E than in C L-E rats. Eliminat
ion half-life was 20.0 days in T L-E rats and 28.9 days in CR L-E rats
. Differential toxicokinetics of TCDD in the two L-E substrains provid
e a likely explanation for the greater sensitivity of the T L-E strain
, since observed differences in tissue concentrations and AUC values a
re in good agreement with the difference in susceptibility. Ln additio
n to the more efficient tissue uptake of TCDD in T L-E rats than in CR
L-E rats, the major contributing factor to differences in toxicokinet
ics seems to be a differential growth rate (dilution by growth), which
in rum appears to provide an explanation for the difference in suscep
tibility. More rapid excretion of TCDD in T L-E rats than in CR L-E ra
ts is clearly a result of higher tissue concentrations in T L-E rats.
However, this faster excretion rate is not sufficient to counterbalanc
e the much slower dilution by growth in T L-E rats than in CR L-E rats
. Thus, dilution by growth can be a more important factor in determini
ng the toxicokinetics and toxicity of TCDD in rodents than is excretio
n. (C) 1996 Society of Toxicology