ADJUNCTIVE INTRACORONARY UROKINASE THERAPY DURING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY

Citation
V. Schachinger et al., ADJUNCTIVE INTRACORONARY UROKINASE THERAPY DURING PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY, The American journal of cardiology, 77(14), 1996, pp. 1174-1178
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
00029149
Volume
77
Issue
14
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1174 - 1178
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9149(1996)77:14<1174:AIUTDP>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Uncontrolled studies have suggested that intracoronary urokinase may b e beneficial in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Therefore, 280 consecutive patients undergoing PT CA were prospectively randomized to receive a bolus injection of 12,50 0 U of heparin followed by a continuous intracoronary infusion via the guiding catheter of either 250 U heparin per minute or 250 U heparin plus 5,000 U urokinase per minute during the procedure. Procedural suc cess rates (<50% final diameter stenosis by quantitative angiography a nd no major ischemic complications during in-hospital follow-up) were similar, with 87% in the heparin group (n=135) and 86% in the heparin plus urokinase group (n=127). Percent diameter stenosis after PTCA was 39 +/- 12% in the heparin group and 41 +/- 12% in the heparin plus ur okinase group (p=NS). There were no differences between groups with re spect to PTCA-related acute vessel occlusion, angiographic evidence of intracoronary thrombus formation, creatine kinase increase after the procedure, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or emergency coronary artery bypass surgery. High-risk subgroup analysis revealed no beneficial eff ect of adjunctive intracoronary urokinase in patients with acute coron ary insufficiency syndromes (n=86) or in stenoses with an irregular lu minal contour (n=134). In addition, although risk stratification accor ding to tile criteria of the American College of Cardiology/American H eart Association Task Force classification proved to be very useful fo r the entire study population, no beneficial effect of intracoronary u rokinase infusion was observed in any of the different risk groups. Th us, compared with heparin alone, adjunctive intracoronary urokinase th erapy does not appear to have any beneficial effect upon procedural ou tcome or on type and frequency of acute complications during PTCA, eve n in subgroups of patients with a high risk for thrombotic complicatio ns.