T. Kosatsky et P. Foran, DO HISTORIC STUDIES OF FISH CONSUMERS SUPPORT THE WIDELY ACCEPTED LOEL FOR METHYLMERCURY IN ADULTS, Neurotoxicology, 17(1), 1996, pp. 177-186
Lack of demonstrated neuro toxicity among fish-eating populations has
been cited by the World Health Organization and others as supporting a
n adult LOEL (lowest observed effect level) of 200 ppb blood mercury e
quivalent. We reviewed 13 published evaluations of neurologic status a
s related to tissue mercury or methylmercury concentration in long-ter
m fish-eating populations. Review criteria included study size, design
(sampling strategy, characterization of exposure, characterization of
outcome) and data analysis. No case of classic Minimata disease is de
scribed in the 13 studies. Also, no study clearly shows a threshold ti
ssue level above which any form of neurologic dysfunction occurs. A st
udy by Valciukas et al. shows no evidence of neurologic impairment in
groups with blood mercury of 10-20 ppb. Studies by Spitzer et al. and
McKeown-Eyssen and Reudy suggest correlation of neurologic dysfunction
with rising blood mercury concentrations in the 60-120 ppb range. Whi
le other studies show no effects associated with rising mercury dose,
numbers are small, participant self-selection likely and the clinical
assessment limited. Together the 73 studies describe neurologic examin
ations in approximately 50 fish eaters having a blood mercury equivale
nt above 200 ppb; of these subjects, neurologic dysfunction consistent
with methylmercury exposure was found in as few as six and as many as
15. We conclude that the oft-cited LOEL for (methyl)mercury of 200 pp
b in blood is not supported by these studies. (C) 1996 Intox Press, In
c.