L. Harris et J. Hasbrouck, MARKET VS LIMIT ORDERS - THE SUPERDOT EVIDENCE ON ORDER SUBMISSION STRATEGY, Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 31(2), 1996, pp. 213-231
This paper discusses performance measures for market and limit orders.
We suggest two measures: one for precommitted traders (who must trade
) and another for passive traders (who are indifferent to trading). We
compute these measures for a sample of NYSE Super-DOT orders. The res
ults suggest that the limit order placement strategies most commonly u
sed by NYSE SuperDOT traders do in fact perform best. Limit orders pla
ced at or better than the prevailing quote perform better than do mark
et orders, even after imputing a penalty for unexecuted orders, and af
ter taking into account market order price improvement. Unconditional
order submission strategies that use SuperDOT to offer liquidity in co
mpetition with the specialist do not appear to be profitable.