Tautologies such as Kids are kids are forms of self-identification in
which objects referenced by a noun phrase are identified by means of e
vocation, with a set of qualities and attributes normally assumed abou
t them. Evocation is thus a reference to shared beliefs, which are the
n reaffirmed in the current context of utterance. Equally crucial for
tautological utterances is the question of how one describes a referen
t, i.e. whether one describes it 'opaquely' or 'transparently'. In ref
erring to a girl in a painting, for example, the speaker can describe
the image-girl opaquely as a blue-eyed girl, if the (image-)girl in th
e painting is blue-eyed; alternatively, the speaker can describe the (
image-)girl transparently as me, if she herself is the model of the gi
rl in the painting. I conclude that tautologies mean what they mean be
cause they involve an evocation of shared knowledge, and they take the
forms they do because shared knowledge is described in ways that maxi
mal linguistic redundancy is achieved for rhetorical purposes.