APOLIPOPROTEIN-E TYPE-4 ALLELE AND ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE - EFFECT ON AGEAT ONSET AND RELATIVE RISK IN DIFFERENT AGE-GROUPS

Citation
A. Kurz et al., APOLIPOPROTEIN-E TYPE-4 ALLELE AND ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE - EFFECT ON AGEAT ONSET AND RELATIVE RISK IN DIFFERENT AGE-GROUPS, Journal of neurology, 243(6), 1996, pp. 452-456
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Neurology
Journal title
ISSN journal
03405354
Volume
243
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
452 - 456
Database
ISI
SICI code
0340-5354(1996)243:6<452:ATAAA->2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The effect of the apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotype on the age at onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and the relative risk conferred by the ap oE epsilon 4 allele were studied in 91 patients and 69 healthy age-mat ched controls. According to the age of presentation, which varied from 44 to 95 years, subjects were divided into four groups. The inheritan ce of at least one epsilon 4 allele was associated with a significant reduction of the age at onset by 7.7 years among patients who were 83 years or older when examined. A weaker inverse relationship between th e epsilon 4 allele and the age at onset was also observed among patien ts who were aged 44-63 years at presentation. The effect of the epsilo n 4 allele was minimal or absent in the two intermediate age categorie s. The relative risk of AD conferred by the inheritance of at least on e epsilon 4 allele showed no con-sistent age-related pattern. The over all risk expressed as an odds ratio was 5.0 (95%: CI 2.-4-10.5). With respect to the limitations of the study, we tentatively conclude (1) t hat the effect of the apoE epsilon 4 allele on the age at onset is not restricted to AD patients of a particular age, in accordance dance wi th current hypotheses on the role of apoE gene products in the biology of AD; (2) that the relative risk of AD associated with the epsilon 4 allele is not significantly modulated by age, Although the APOE epsil on 4 allele is an important susceptibility factor for AB occurring in middle age as well as in later life, it is of limited value in routine clinical diagnosis and should not be used for predictive testing in a symptomatic individuals.